one day when i was reading through the web, i saw a many comment talking about DR MACK, some said he can restore broken relationship, i had no choice than to contact him on Dr Mack, i got a reply from him telling me that i will have my husband back. my Husband James Scot left me for another woman for three months' ever since then my life have been filled with pains sorrow and heart break because he was my first love who disflowered me when i was 21 years old. We've been connecting with objects even before ancient Greeks talked to their weapons. So this makes me think about the recent episode of This American Life, where they take the Psychopath Test. Mark Johnson Without sounding like a cynical nutcase - the music industry, television, movies, literature, fashion trends... A person that does well on the free site is more likely to decide to play for money. The site's dirty little secret is that it uses computer programs to generate articles about stocks in the news. I love the subject, but for crying out loud, just get him on the show and settle the matter: "Mind is a pattern perceived by a mind."There was an interview this week on NPR with an author whose topic was "filtering" by the various entities on the internet, both manevolent and well-intended. I would suggest that Cleverbot's response in this case indicates that it is fully human, just psychopathic. I'm in no way an expert on any of this, but listening to Jad and Caleb Chung argue about life and whether or not a Furby has what constitutes life made me want to comment.
i believed him and today i am glad to let you all know that my husband is back. about two years ago, A friend of mine rose donly told me he saw some testimonies of this great priest tokubo that he can bring back lover within 24 hours, i laugh it out and said i am not interested but because of the love my friend had for me, she consulted the great priest on my behalf and to my greatest surprise after 24 hours my boyfriend is going to call me for the very first time after three months that he is missing me and that he is so sorry for every thing he made me went through. Maybe the intelligence of objects in the future will encourage us to regain a more connective spirit. The following is a passage from the Upanishads: it would take a machine more than intelligence to experiencing the same sentiment: Then he realized, "I am indeed this creation for I have poured it forth from myself." In that way he became this creation, and verily he who knows this becomes a creator in this creation.chris from LA wrote: "Elite it up, don't dumb it down. Essentially, being a psychopath means that you show no empathy. they're all criticized when they're too formulaic - but that doesn't stop their rise to popularity. The site generates hundreds of articles every month in an attempt to draw people to the site. Basically about the little wormy programs that collect information about us while we are on line. What possible profit can be gained by operating a flirt-bot on an on-line dating service? The furby thing made me laugh-- reiminded of a trip i took with my ex and his stepdaughtershe had gotten a furby for Christmas - we were on our christmas vacation traveling across the country to see my ex-inlaws. Bot: I don't know what to do about my sadness Me: Radiolab Bot: Makes sense link to screencap would happen if we set two "sentient" bots down to have a conversation of their own? It seems Caleb was arguing about what constitutes life in psychological terms--that the Furby can process and react to stimuli means it's alive.
Kinda vaguely similar to viewing our neurons( our hardware) as being meshed with microtubular structures. The beginning of this show made me think of Digital: A Love Story. I think there are two separate questions raised by the show that got lumped together. This question might be impossible to answer at this point in time since scientist cannot agree on a consistent definition of life.
I suspect having a higher density of nanotubes making up a structure with mass of 2-3 kg may attract enough 'consciousness' as it were. April, I remember hearing that the original onboard computer voice for fighter planes - "B****in' Betty" - was selected because apparently studies found a female voice got a male pilot's attention faster.(That said, I think Boeing's aircraft actually use a male voice at this point.)I tried cleverbot and probly will again just because it was so funny but I love the idea of it a compilation of thought it's great but still it couldn't decipher what it was I was talking about and kept telling me it was not a robot for some reason even though I never brought it up... Cleverbot: Lol.me: I know you can do better than this. Cleverbot conversation RMG00736393 User: How did you come to be? It's a really short and sweet (free) video game about falling in love with a bot over email. Cleverbot or Bina48 may not seem alive when compared with a human, but might seem very much alive relative to a prion or a virus.
Who are we to say that another form of machine could never attain that? In the future, when we will be able to build such machines, we would first need to learn and understand new life division - Organical Life Form and Artificial Life Form, which is still Life, though extending in a totally different way. We need to remember, that when artifical machines become sentient life forms, when we turn on a machine, we loose any privileges to it - it is its own master. Your response has incorrect punctuation in it, which proves my assertion. I heard from my brother (who is teaching English in China) that a common technique to make an oral examiner think you are more fluent than you are is this: you memorize large scripted stories full of idiomatic phrases, and then learn certain 'segue' keywords to direct the conversation into your memorized script.
As a result of this program (and the comments) I've begun to understand 'bots as "books - literature - with conversational access". Cleverbot: How was my response grammatically incorrect? Jon's experience with Bina is a good example of how effective this is.
How would we treat them , what rights would they have.would teach them altruism. If it is true that consciousness builds up gradually in the human as the numbers of microtubules increase while the human develops -to end up with a certain number of microtubules to hold-as it were- a certain 'mass' of consciousness, then having the entire amount of consciousness arriving in the carbon nanotube structure at the same moment with EYES WIDE OPEN may present somecomplications ...maybe not? Individually, no one cell in our body thinks or feels, but, together, they form a unified whole that sees itself not as some gestalt consciousness formed of multiple components, but a single, thinking, feeling entity. AI might be a long way from being human, but it often seems very close to being alive.
I can't help but disagree with the idea that a machine will never be capable of feeling. We are simply clusters of biological nanobots that communicate via chemical signals to form something greater than the sum of their parts. I thought that people would interested that a bot finally past the test. If a machine is self-sufficient or can provide for itself - even for a finite period of time - and is aware of its existence and the physical world it exists in, and is able to learn and communicate emotions and ideas of its own, why shouldn't it be considered alive? As a side note, no less than HH the Dalai Lama has said it is theoretically possible for a computer to have a soul.
Hmmmmm Great story What about the idea of using multi-walled carbon nanotubes as a biomimetic structure in place of microtubules. I just can't go there,"and then later saying, "you know, the punctuated equilibrium guys, Stephen Jay Gould and them? I think you guys missed a huge part of this topic by not covering Hiroshi Ishiguro, who has been seriously working on creating a human like androids at Osaka University.
So Freedom, who was thinking about becoming a mom someday, decided to get a little practice by adopting two gerbils and one ... Last year, Jon Ronson got an assignment from GQ to interview robots. Perhaps if you combine the What Does Technology Want? It was good fun back then -- a nice break from Norton Commander, ya' know? But real intelligence, that humans will not be able to create through mechanized means. Failing to even mention Ray Kurzweil and laughing off his work as "those people who think computers are going to grow legs and walk away. Been listening to your podcast everyday at work for the past month. Congratulations to Robert Krulwich on the recent Radiolab "Talking to Machines". For those who think that a chatbot is unusual or unique, I assure you that it is not. Cleverbot: My favorite game ever is 'The Legend of Zelda Ocarina of Time'. It can also be the process of determining the best interface for a new website.
He soon found himself in Vermont, sitting across from what's purported to be the world's most sentient robot: Bina48. My Husband broke up 6 months ago and left me heartbroken, this made me sick and my problem became very very difficult and it made me almost gave up but after the love spell from Dr.mack, my relationship was restored instantly, I was happy that the outcome was fantastic, only 3 days after [email protected] Never in my life have I thought this would work so fast. and Emergence episodes you could make a case for empathy and imagination emerging from mechanical production. Its interesting, as I listen to the section about the Furbies, my mind is mixing public radio shows. And props to him especially for the improvements he has made to his AI project "Java Application for Discursion Analysis and Biologically-Unassisted Mechanical Response Delivery". There is a business reason for these chatbots on dating sites: Men far outnumber the women, and in order to keep these men active (and paying), the sites use the chatbots to ensure that every man achieves some level of success. And artificial intelligence is not just about modeling sentience.
We begin with a love story--from a man who unwittingly fell in love with a chatbot on an online dating site. And when they walk away, they get to take what they want from it, while the computer sits there alone with limited context of what was discussed and no ability to link it back to that person. I wonder if it has some kind of other dictionary function that doesn't let it recognize words that are not in the English lexicon? Without dismissing the singularity, I'm unsure why it is acceptable that at some threshold of intelligence a machine becomes sentient like a human. How about evolution through natural selection, can you "go there? Or are you just playing dumb of the sake of the show again?
Then, we encounter a robot therapist whose inventor became so unnerved by its success that he pulled the plug. That wouldn't make sense, but it's one of the only things I can think of. Intelligence is like the scaffolding of a much richer experience. Cleverbot: Exactly, who is he, all I know is that he has a frozen cat! " What do you think WE are if not just extraordinarily complex mechanical machines? I know you traditionally play the role of the ignorant elder generation guy who's never "seen the movie," or apparently ever even picked up a copy of scientific American or watched a TED talk; you play the part of the guy who pretends to be incredulous about scientific concepts and has the sort of, religious-traditionalist, dualistic, non-materialist kind of world view, but you guys have been going way too far and playing way too 'dumb' lately.